TruZero reconciles bank, subledger and intercompany activity continuously, and explains every proposal in cited evidence a reviewer can disagree with line by line. Nothing reaches your ledger without a named person approving it.
Bring your own exception. We will work it live.
Every close platform can now draft a variance narrative. None of them explains the exception — why this specific item did not reconcile, in evidence a reviewer can contest and an auditor can test.
A variance narrative is written for the CFO. An exception explanation is written for the auditor. TruZero is built for the second one.
Lineage tells you where a number came from. It does not tell you why the item failed to match, what mechanism produced the difference, or whether this counterparty has done the same thing eleven times before. Those are the facts a preparer would have written by hand, and they are the ones a reviewer is entitled to disagree with.
Most AI close tools put a person in the queue. The agent does the work, a reviewer clicks approve, and the system writes. If the reviewer is skipped, the write still lands, because the approval was a step in a process rather than a condition of the operation.
In TruZero the approval is a precondition of the operation itself. Every data-modifying operation carries a human approval reference, stored one-way and chained into a trail that cannot be edited after the fact. There is no configuration that removes it, because it is not a setting. It is the architecture.
And TruZero writes nothing to your ledger at all.
Adjustments stay proposals. Your team posts them in your ERP, under your existing controls, on your existing approval chain. TruZero produces the reconciliation, the explanation and the evidence — it does not reach into the system of record to act on them.
Not a suite of modules you assemble. A single path the work travels, with each stage doing something the next one depends on.
You own the close calendar and you sign. The exception queue is where your week goes, and the evidence pack is what you defend.
More than one ERP, more than one bank, intercompany in more than one currency, and a consolidation that has to tie.
Where the question is not whether the software matched it, but who approved it, on what evidence, and whether you can show it again.
Send us a break your team argued about last close — a timing difference, an intercompany mismatch, a payment that would not clear. We will work it live and you can decide whether the explanation is one you would put in front of your auditor.
Direct: amitchopra@truzero.ai
No trial signup, no sandbox link. Sessions are run by the people who built the platform.